sábado, 29 de octubre de 2011

COMMUNISM

PUBLICADO PARA HOY 30 DE OCTUBRE



From: Antonio M.Abradelo

Subject: Cuba,prohíbido olvidar,Historia de una traición.
To:

En febrero 1ero de 1961 la incipiente dictadura Kastrista condenó a 30 años de prisión a los norteamericanos Alford Eugen Gibson,Leonard Louis Smith, George R. Beck, Tommy Berker, Donald Joe Green y James B. Beanes, actuó como FISCAL Fernando Flores Ibarra y los letrados Aníbal Pacheco y José Fleitas Careaga fueron los abogados defensores.(Diario de una Traición, III Parte, Revista Ideal,2011 Año XXXIX.No.377.Miami).

En aquellos tiempos la administración norteamericana en el poder no intervino para obtener su liberación, pues “querían dejar de ejemplo lo sucedido en Cuba ante el Mundo),comenzando una cadena de errores e intervenciones contra la democracia y libertad de nuestro pueblo, que han llevado a 52 años de dictadura y violaciones a los Derechos Humanos del pueblo Cubano.

Preguntamos, ¿Por qué hoy es distinto con Alan Gross judío norteamericano encarcelado en Cuba?.

Por más que lo nieguen la Secretaria de Estado Hillary Clinton y el saliente Presidente Barack Husseim Obama, ES UN NUEVO E IGNOMINIOSO “Pacto del Zanjón” que están fraguando con la dictadura Kastrista.

Pero hoy, al igual que ayer les decimos como dijese el General Antonio Maceo, ”El Titán de Bronce”:


“La libertad de Cuba no es negociable, no hay libertad sin honra”.


La sangre derramada a lo largo y ancho de nuestra Isla por la libertad de Cuba no ha sido en vano, Cuba será libre.!


Antonio M.Abradelo Rodríguez

Delegado en Puerto Rico


Organización Presídio Histórico Cubano

(PPHC.Casa del Preso,Miami).

"Solo con la vida cesará entre nosotros la batalla por la libertad".José Martí.

Exígimos libertad para los Presos Políticos Cubanos y elecciones democráticas.

Para Cuba ya es hora!

Cambio,no transición!

.“Los que luchan viven, los que contemplan vegetan

”Those who fight, live,those who contemplate, vegetate”

=========================



Khmer Rouge Tribunal in Jeopardy

War Crimes

by Daniel Graeber | on March 6th, 2007

The Khmer Rouge was an extremist Communist power that was the ruling party, under Pol Pot, in Cambodia from 1975-1979. The Khmer Rouge sought to establish a "New People" through isolation from outside influence. They tried to exploit communist ideals to create a classless society by way of an agrarian utopia through isolation, hard labor, and extermination. Following a Vietnamese ouster, the Khmer Rouge leaders were accused of the torture, starvation, and mass slaughter of over 1.7 million Cambodians, or nearly a quarter of the country's population. Many of the key former leaders of the Khmer Rouge, including Pol Pot, have died and many are in their late 70's. Only one, however, Kang Kek Ieu ("Duch"), chief executioner for the Khmer Rouge, is in custody.

Then UN Secretary General Kofi Annan initiated an examination to prosecute the leaders of the Khmer Rouge, and in 1999, a bill was introduced in Cambodia to establish a mixed tribunal system there. The Khmer Rouge Tribunal commingles domestic law with international customs and treaties. For example, the definition of genocide has been altered according to the Khmer Rouge Statute, and does not correlate to the Genocide Convention per se. The Tribunal also prohibits foreigners from addressing the court, and only advises international criminal standards if there is a gap in existing Cambodian law.

There have been many obstacles to this tribunal and its fate hangs in the balance. There have been contentions from the Cambodians regarding an understanding of the intent of the Tribunal system, as well as the scope of indictments and the use of foreign counsel. The Cambodians are accused of attempting to limit the scope of the investigation and retain complete autonomy over the system. There have also been allegations questioning the independence and aptitude of Cambodian legal professionals. According to an article by The Guardian, an investigative judge involved with the process has stated that "if new rules are not adopted we will not go forward because it would be useless. Then we would have to examine the possibility of the international judges asking the UN to withdraw the whole process. It's now or never". Thirty years after the atrocities, it appears that justice is on the verge of abandonment.

The mixed tribunal system raises many questions. According to the rules of the International Criminal Court, prosecution cannot proceed without invitation, and invokes a "principle of complimentarity", which states that the ICC compliments a national system and does not replace that system. However, the ICC only holds jurisdiction over cases occurring after its establishment. Furthermore, mixed tribunals are not Security Council derived, but are the results of negotiations between states and the UN. While this system leaves the autonomous entity of the nation state in tact and coordinates with international standards, the logistics may prove overly burdensome, as in the case of the Khmer Rouge.

=========================

13of19 Bloody History of Communism



Uploaded by rst5555 on Nov 22, 2010

"Bloody History of Communism", "victims of communism", "communist crimes", "communist party", " communism is a crime", communism, "against humanity", "mass killing", "mass murdering", "mass grave", "cultural revolution", china, "chinese cannibalism", fascism, leninism, marxism, starlin, "mao zedong", "mao tse tung", communist, bloody, history, oppression, suppression, "brain washing"



POR: WWW.CUBANOTICIASDISIDENTES.COM

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario